Appellant Jesse Chavez appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child under fourteen years of age. In eight issues, he lodges five categories of complaints, arguing (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to support his conviction; (2) ineffective assistance of counsel during the guilt/innocence phase; (3) appellant’s waiver of his constitutional right to a jury trial was uninformed and involuntary; (4) ineffective assistance of counsel during the punishment phase; and (5) the presiding judge of the trial court erred by failing to review the order of the associate judge denying appellant’s motion for new trial following appellant’s objections under Government Code section 54A.013. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Factual and Procedural Background Jessica, who is the mother of the complainant, Jane, was in a relationship with appellant beginning in 2010 and ending in March 2016. Shortly after their relationship started, Jessica, along with Jane and Jessica’s son, John,[1] moved into a home rented by appellant’s family. In 2015, Jessica and her children moved out of the home rented by appellant’s family and into an apartment. Although appellant did not have his possessions at Jessica’s apartment, he spent about five days a week at the apartment with Jessica and her children, and appellant had a key to the apartment. Because appellant often worked at night, he sometimes took care of Jane and John during the day when they were not in school, while Jessica was at work. The main living room had two full-sized beds where Jane and John slept. Appellant and Jessica slept in the bed in the apartment’s only bedroom. After the relationship between appellant and Jessica ended in March 2016, Jessica and her children went to live at the home of Jessica’s parents. Shortly thereafter, Jane told Jessica that she had been sexually abused by appellant. Jessica drove to appellant’s house with Jane and John in her car to confront appellant regarding Jane’s outcry. Jessica called appellant and told him that she urgently needed to talk to him. Appellant came out of the house where he was living and spoke to Jessica through the passenger-side window. According to Jessica, Jane looked at appellant and told him, “You hurt me,” and then started crying. Jessica
