Johnson & Johnson Vision offices in Silicon Valley.
The jury determined that Johnson & Johnson was negligent and that the company intentionally misrepresented the safety of its talc products but that those factors did not cause Lee’s cancer. The jury then went on to make a determination on punitive damages, despite the verdict sheet's instructions that it should only do so if it found against the defendants on causation.
January 07, 2025 at 05:39 PM
1 minute read
A Pittsburgh talc trial that spanned a month and a half ended Monday in a defense win for Johnson & Johnson. But the jury that issued the verdict might not know that.
In filling out the verdict sheet, the Allegheny County jury awarded $22 million in punitive damages against Johnson & Johnson. Only, the jury had also found in the company’s favor on causation and was not supposed to answer questions on punitive damages.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...
