Johnson’s talc powder on a supermarket shelf in Baltimore. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
The plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, arguing that, “At a minimum, the verdict shows confusion and lack of understanding of the issues or instructions.”
January 22, 2025 at 06:02 PM
1 minute read
A recent talc verdict out of Pittsburgh included an odd finding from the jury.
Odd enough, the plaintiffs argue, to warrant a new trial.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...
